What is ROAS?
ROAS, or return on ad spend, measures how much revenue your advertising brings in for every unit of currency you spend on it. It's the most common way to judge whether a Google Ads, Meta, TikTok or Amazon campaign is paying its way, and it's the number many ad platforms optimize toward automatically.
ROAS on its own doesn't tell you whether you made a profit. A 3× ROAS can be excellent for one business and a loss for another. That's why this calculator also works out your break-even ROAS from your profit margin.
How to calculate ROAS
Example: you spend $1,500 on a campaign that generates $6,300 in sales.
The same result can be written three ways, and you'll see all of them in ad platforms and reports:
- 4.2× or 4.2: a multiplier, as used in this calculator.
- 4.2:1: a ratio, $4.20 back for every $1 spent.
- 420%: a percentage, as used by Google Ads target ROAS bidding.
What is a good ROAS?
You'll often read that 4:1 is a "good" ROAS. It's a rough average, and it's misleading as a target, because the ROAS you need depends on your profit margin. A software company with 80% margins profits at a ROAS most retailers would lose money on. A reseller with 20% margins needs a much higher ROAS just to cover its costs.
The fairer question is: is my ROAS above my break-even ROAS? This table shows the minimum ROAS needed at different margins:
| Profit margin | Break-even ROAS | Typical of |
|---|---|---|
| 20% | 5.00× | Electronics, resellers, marketplaces |
| 25% | 4.00× | Many physical products after shipping |
| 30% | 3.33× | General e-commerce |
| 40% | 2.50× | Fashion, beauty, own-brand goods |
| 50% | 2.00× | Premium and direct-to-consumer brands |
| 70% | 1.43× | Courses, services |
| 80% | 1.25× | Software and digital products |
The "typical of" column is a rough guide. Your own margin is what counts.
Break-even ROAS explained
Break-even ROAS is the point where the profit from ad-driven sales exactly pays for the ads. Below it, every sale loses money once ad costs are included. Above it, the campaign is profitable.
Example: with a 30% margin, break-even ROAS = 1 ÷ 0.30 = 3.33×. Our example campaign's 4.2× ROAS is above that, so it's profitable: $6,300 × 30% = $1,890 of gross profit, minus $1,500 of ad spend, leaves $390.
For an accurate result, use your contribution margin: the share of each sale left after all variable costs, not just the product cost. Include shipping, packaging, payment processing fees, marketplace fees and the average cost of returns. Leaving these out makes your break-even ROAS look lower than it really is.
Setting a target ROAS for profit
Breaking even isn't the goal. To keep a set share of revenue as profit after ad costs, subtract that share from your margin first:
Example: with a 40% margin and a goal of keeping 10% of revenue as profit, target ROAS = 1 ÷ (0.40 − 0.10) = 3.33×, compared with a break-even ROAS of 2.5×.
ROAS vs ROI
ROAS and ROI are often confused, but they answer different questions:
- ROAS compares revenue with ad spend. It ignores the cost of the products you sold.
- ROI (return on investment) compares profit with the total cost, so it shows what you actually earned.
Using the example above: ROAS is 4.2×, but the $1,500 of ad spend produced $390 of profit after product costs, an ROI on the ad spend of $390 ÷ $1,500 = 26%. Both numbers are useful. ROAS is quick to compare across campaigns, and ROI shows what reaches the bottom line.
Common ROAS mistakes
- Mixing revenue definitions. Decide whether revenue includes sales tax or VAT, shipping charges and refunds, and use the same definition every time. Revenue excluding tax and net of refunds is the most honest choice.
- Trusting platform ROAS blindly. Google Ads, Meta and TikTok each use their own attribution window and often count the same sale. Platform ROAS is usually higher than what your analytics or store data shows. Compare like with like.
- Comparing different kinds of campaign. Retargeting and brand search campaigns reach people who were already likely to buy, so their ROAS is naturally high. Prospecting campaigns that find new customers will look worse on ROAS but may be what drives growth.
- Ignoring repeat purchases. For subscriptions or products people rebuy, first-order ROAS understates the value of a new customer. Consider customer lifetime value when setting targets.
- Judging too early. A few days of data or a handful of sales can swing ROAS wildly. Look at a full buying cycle before making big budget changes.